Kevin Magnussen’s tactics, aimed at protecting his Haas teammate Nico Hulkenberg’s position for points, proved successful as he achieved a commendable seventh-place finish.
The team principal of McLaren, Andrea Stella, has issued a strong directive to Magnussen, advising him to refrain from participating in racing activities after his controversial performance in the Miami Grand Prix sprint.
During the 19-lap race, Magnussen received a significant 35-second time penalty due to various infractions, including going off track to gain an advantage and cutting the chicane while defending against Lewis Hamilton from Mercedes.
Magnussen’s tactics, aimed at safeguarding Haas teammate Nico Hulkenberg’s position for points, proved effective as he secured a commendable seventh-place finish.
Despite the outcome, Magnussen remained unapologetic, although he admitted feeling “stupid” for his driving approach, resulting in him accumulating three penalty points, bringing his total to eight.
In response to Magnussen’s actions, Stella expressed clear disapproval and advocated for disciplinary measures.
He emphasized the intentional nature of Magnussen’s behavior, asserting that penalties should increase significantly for repeated offenses.
Stella suggested that Magnussen should take some time away from the track for reflection, proposing that spending time with family might encourage a reconsideration of sportsmanship.
However, Lando Norris offered a different perspective, praising Magnussen’s strategic defense in support of his teammate.
Drawing comparisons to tactical maneuvers in Monaco, Norris highlighted the complexities of team dynamics and strategic decisions in Formula 1.
Christian Horner’s #RedBull still facing potential consequences as #FIA intervenes.
He acknowledged the controversial nature of Magnussen’s actions but maintained that they served the team’s interests.
Despite being scrutinized by stewards for unsportsmanlike conduct after the race, Magnussen avoided further consequences following deliberation.
The stewards’ decision marked the end of a contentious chapter, leaving room for ongoing debate regarding racing ethics and the enforcement of regulations in the sport.