Why tamper with a masterpiece? That was the question asked by the majority of the Formula E paddock when it became apparent last year that the Rome street circuit, located in the EUR district of the eternal city, would no longer host the all-electric world championship after five years. The circuit was architecturally impressive, with extravagant structures scattered around the historically questionable streets of Benito Mussolini’s creation. Despite this, the racetrack itself was exceptional, winding its way through a park and the surrounding streets. The drivers relished the challenge it presented, with its bumps and undulations making it almost the perfect Formula E track. On top of that, it was situated in one of the world’s most iconic cities. However, its high cost and a major multi-car crash that occurred during a race led to the decision to explore other options.
The financial aspect of Formula E events is shrouded in secrecy, but it is believed that the expenses associated with closing off roads, installing barriers, and setting up the necessary infrastructure in Rome amounted to approximately €5 million. This figure does not include additional costs such as the pits facility. The chaotic multi-car crash that occurred during one of the races provided a convenient excuse to reevaluate the situation. There were also political factors at play, as Formula E supporter Virginia Raggi stepped down as the mayor of Rome in 2021. Regardless of the exact reasons, Rome was replaced by Misano for the 2024 season.
Misano, located in the Emilia Romagna region, is a picturesque destination, especially in the springtime. The owners and staff of the circuit have been incredibly welcoming and accommodating to the Formula E paddock. While the track is primarily designed for two-wheeled motorsport, adjustments were made to address track limits violations. Race director Scot Elkins consulted with drivers like Lucas di Grassi to implement changes, including the addition of ‘banana-kerbs’ on corner exits. Although there were still numerous violations, particularly during qualifying, they did not significantly impact the race results due to the nature of Formula E races. While not perfect, the modifications helped minimize controversies related to track limits.
Opinions among drivers regarding racing at Misano varied. Mitch Evans expressed his skepticism about the venue, questioning the need to race at certain locations and suggesting that better venues could be found. Jake Hughes, on the other hand, acknowledged that while drivers may not enjoy the racing, the fans seem to appreciate it. He called for a balance between the perspectives of drivers and fans. The nature of the racing at Misano, with its emphasis on filling gaps and navigating multiple-wide sections, deviates from the traditional aspects of motorsport that drivers typically enjoy.
The race at Misano often feels like the cars are operating outside of their natural environment. However, seeing the Formula E cars up close at the track reveals their true speed, which may not be fully appreciated when watching on TV. This was evident when the writer witnessed Nick Cassidy’s dramatic crash during a practice session. Some drivers, like Evans, were critical of the racing style, while others, like Hughes, acknowledged the fans’ enthusiasm. The accordion effect created by the high-speed corners leading to long straights contributed to the peloton-like nature of the race. The difference in race distances between Saturday and Sunday also played a role in the dynamics of the races. While the first race required energy-saving strategies for the majority of the event, the second race had a more balanced approach. The drivers felt that the simulations conducted by the FIA accurately predicted the race distance for Sunday’s event.
Overall, opinions on the racing at Misano were polarized. Some drivers vehemently disliked it, while others accepted it as part of the sport. It may be beneficial for Formula E’s CEO, Jeff Dodds, and FIA representative Marek Nawarecki to address the drivers and explain the technical, sporting, and marketing reasons behind the racing style. This could help drivers understand the larger goals of Formula E and how the racing format appeals to existing fans and attracts new ones, particularly from younger generations and those unfamiliar with traditional motorsport. Formula E has always aimed to be different, and it may be necessary to help drivers see the benefits of this approach beyond their own perspectives.
The racing at Misano is fast-paced and unpredictable, which can be captivating depending on one’s preferences. Formula E highlights overtaking maneuvers in its post-race calculations and marketing efforts, although many of these moves are not genuine overtakes. However, the viewers, who may view the races as a thrilling AI simrace, likely do not mind. While this style of racing may not appeal to purists, the upcoming Monaco E-Prix offers a more traditional racing experience that is condensed into a shorter timeframe, unlike Formula 1 races that can be lengthy and tedious. Therefore, embracing diversity and mixing things up in Formula E is positive, but it may be necessary to find a balance and avoid going to extremes.