Christian Horner, the team principal of the Red Bull Formula 1 team, has chosen not to address rumors that have been circulating about him. These rumors stem from materials that were allegedly part of a recent investigation into his conduct and were sent to various high-ranking figures in the F1 community as well as journalists.
Red Bull’s parent company conducted an external investigation into the allegations and cleared Horner of any wrongdoing. However, an email titled “Christian Horner investigation evidence” was sent to 150 individuals involved in F1, inviting them to review materials related to Red Bull’s investigation. Notably, nobody from Red Bull or Red Bull Racing received this email, except for Jos Verstappen, who is Max Verstappen’s father and has an obvious connection to the team.
The authenticity of the materials, which consist of 79 screengrabs of digital conversations, has not been verified yet. In response to the leak, a statement was released on behalf of Horner, stating that he will not comment on anonymous speculation. He maintains his denial of the allegations and emphasizes his cooperation with the independent investigation.
The leak of these materials is seen by many in the F1 community as an attempt to further pressure Horner or discredit him, especially after the investigation ruled in his favor. Other team bosses expressed the need for more transparency following Red Bull’s limited statement on the matter.
Red Bull has stated that the investigation report is confidential and will not be commenting further to respect the privacy of all parties involved. F1 and the FIA have not provided any comments, and it is unclear if Ford, Red Bull’s engine partner, has been satisfied with the actions taken by the parent company to address the issue.
While Red Bull GmbH has not responded to the leak, it is likely that they will investigate further to determine who shared the materials, considering the emphasis they have placed on confidentiality. It is also unknown if the complainant will appeal Red Bull’s dismissal or pursue legal action, which could potentially reopen or relocate the investigation process.