Google Maps has always been a comprehensive mapping platform, serving as a one-stop solution for users. Its main objective is to provide detailed maps, exploration options, street-level imagery, and other functionalities that wouldn’t be practical in a navigation app.
Recently, Google Maps has been increasingly focused on monetization. Therefore, it has been giving more attention to store information, reviews, opening hours, and other data that can contribute to the search giant’s success.
While Google Maps does include a navigation component that many users rely on for directions, the company has been striving to enhance its navigation features, although its primary emphasis remains on developing innovative functionalities in other areas.
In contrast, Waze has seen minimal improvements in the past few years. The only significant update was a recent redesign that simplified the reporting process and made it easier for users to mark the location of hazards on the map. Apart from that, Waze has not received any major features, sticking to its existing lineup, which is starting to feel outdated.
Considering that Waze already provides traffic information and other data to Google Maps, it seems reasonable to expect something in return. Therefore, the transition from Google Maps to Waze should commence with the implementation of these features.
Offline maps are a crucial aspect of this transition. Although Waze typically requires an internet connection to download and upload traffic data, offline maps are necessary when users are unable to access the internet. Waze should ensure that users can navigate without struggling to find their way. While offline, Waze can continue guiding users along a pre-set route without downloading new traffic data or searching for alternative routes.
In the absence of an internet connection, Google Maps functions similarly to a traditional satellite navigation device. It searches for routes, provides turn-by-turn guidance, and generates alternate routes. However, it does not download traffic information, meaning users won’t receive updates on heavy traffic areas.
Another feature that seamlessly aligns with the Waze concept is eco-friendly routes. Introduced in 2021 on Google Maps, these routes are designed to reduce fuel consumption and emissions while driving to a destination. Unlike the fastest routes typically suggested by navigation apps, eco-friendly routes take into account factors such as road incline and traffic conditions. Google claims that since its launch three years ago, this feature has significantly reduced emissions, equivalent to taking 500K cars off the road.
Waze, by default, searches for the quickest routes. This aligns perfectly with the app’s core concept, as staying updated with real-time traffic enables it to discover faster paths to a destination.
Nevertheless, the environmentally conscious routing could elevate the navigation experience, particularly in congested areas. The app would be capable of identifying the busiest intersections and helping drivers avoid them, thereby potentially reducing emissions. Even if this results in a slight increase in estimated time of arrival (ETA), the eco-friendly routes should be optional, allowing drivers to choose how they utilize Waze. If the eco-friendly route does not significantly impact the ETA, it should be prioritized over the fastest route.
Now, let’s discuss the interface. Please note that this is solely my opinion, and I urge you to hear me out before rushing to the comments section to express your disagreement with the new Google Maps.
Waze presents a cartoonish interface that seems out of place for a modern software application. I find it surprising that the parent company has not made efforts to refine it in recent years. The interface remains largely unchanged, and the inclusion of gamification elements, such as moods, only adds unnecessary clutter to the user interface without providing any substantial benefits.
In contrast, Google has endeavored to make Google Maps a profitable platform, yet it still maintains a cleaner, more streamlined, and contemporary UI. Admittedly, I am not a fan of the new color scheme either, but I am gradually becoming accustomed to it. Given time, I believe others will do the same.
The truth is, many readers have informed me that they refrain from using the Waze app due to its horrendous interface. I cannot blame them. Waze deserves a more sophisticated UI that does not resemble the design of a child’s toy. Perhaps studying Google Maps could serve as a starting point to enhance the application in this crucial aspect.
According to the Source autoevolution.com